Can AI Do Financial Research?

Large language models are already capable of summarizing financial research, but are they ready to conduct it? In their latest paper, researchers from Google, Boston College, and Columbia introduce a framework where a large language model doesn’t just fetch data—it acts as an autonomous AI research agent capable of navigating the “hypothesis discovery loop.” By placing an LLM within a human-designed laboratory—complete with a symbolic language of 66 accounting primitives and a standardized backtesting pipeline—the authors tested whether AI can move beyond black-box predictions to generate economically legible and statistically robust signals. This isn’t just about throwing a transformer at a price series; it is a systematic attempt to automate the “propose–test–reflect” cycle that defines empirical finance.

Continue reading »

Quantpedia in June 2026

Hello all,

What have we accomplished in the last month?

– A new Live Strategies reporting section
– Quantpedia Awards 2026 Winners Interview
– 14 new Quantpedia Premium strategies
– 3 new related research papers
– 7 new backtests
– and finally, 8 new posts on our Quantpedia blog

Continue reading »

Silicon vs. Satoshi: Tactical Asset Rotation Between NASDAQ-100 and Bitcoin

In the modern retail attention economy, Bitcoin and the NASDAQ-100 are not merely separate assets; they are competing narratives. Both appeal to the same pool of speculative capital, the same appetite for asymmetric upside, and the same behavioral forces of FOMO, herding, and recency bias. When technology stocks dominate the imagination, capital clusters around QQQ and the artificial intelligence trade. When Bitcoin breaks out, the crowd’s attention pivots toward crypto’s promise of explosive upside.

This paper tests whether that rotation in attention leaves a systematic footprint. Using Donchian breakout signals across QQQ and Bitcoin, with cash as a fallback during periods of consolidation, we examine whether investors can harvest momentum without remaining permanently exposed to either asset’s full drawdown profile. The results suggest that the answer is yes: retail attention does not move randomly. It rotates, it concentrates, and—when measured through price breakouts—it can be systematically exploited.

Continue reading »

Quantpedia Premium Update – June 30th

Five new strategies have been added. Three new related research paper have been included into existing strategy reviews and six new short free blog posts have been published during last few weeks. Plus, six trading strategies have been backtested in QuantConnect in the previous two weeks.

Continue reading »

Guardrails Make the Researcher: What an AI Agent Got Right (And Wrong) Replicating Nine Equity Anomalies

An autonomous research agent replicated nine published US-equity anomalies on clean, survivorship-free data. The question is not only what it found (out-of-sample decay is the rule, and on a faithful build none survive — the lone apparent survivor turned out to be a construction error the discipline caught) but whether you can trust an agent to find it, and the checks that decide the answer.

Continue reading »

Why Mean-Variance Optimization Breaks Down

Mean-Variance Optimization remains the intellectual cornerstone of modern portfolio theory, yet its real-world deployment via plug-in MVO often delivers unstable, over-leveraged portfolios that collapse out-of-sample. The core insight from VertoxQuant’s analysis is profound: raw plug-in MVO does not merely propagate estimation error—it systematically amplifies it. This error-maximization phenomenon occurs because the optimizer’s inverse-covariance operator assigns extreme weights to directions that appear low-risk, which, in finite samples, are dominated by noise rather than signal. For academics, this reveals a fundamental statistical pathology; for practitioners, it explains why backtests sparkle while live portfolios bleed.

Continue reading »