{"id":5681,"date":"2020-01-18T23:37:25","date_gmt":"2020-01-18T22:37:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/quantpedia.com\/?p=5681"},"modified":"2025-06-04T14:30:00","modified_gmt":"2025-06-04T12:30:00","slug":"quantpedia-premium-update-18th-january-2019","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/vvv.quantpedia.com\/es\/quantpedia-premium-update-18th-january-2019\/","title":{"rendered":"Quantpedia Premium Update – 18th January 2020"},"content":{"rendered":"

New strategies:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

#467 – Bitcoin Intraday Momentum <\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Period of rebalancing:<\/strong> Intraday
Markets traded: <\/strong>cryptos
Instruments used for trading:<\/strong> cryptos
Complexity:<\/strong> Simple strategy
Backtest period:<\/strong> 2015 – 2019
Indicative performance:<\/strong> 28.62%
Estimated volatility:<\/strong> 30.26%<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Source paper:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Caporale, Plastun: Momentum Effects in the Cryptocurrency Market after One-Day Abnormal Returns<\/strong>
https:\/\/papers.ssrn.com\/sol3\/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3480923<\/a>
Abstracto:
This paper examines whether there exists a momentum effect after one-day abnormal returns in the cryptocurrency market. For this purpose a number of hypotheses of interest are tested for the BitCoin, Ethereum and LiteCoin exchange rates vis-\u00e0-vis the US dollar over the period 01.01.2017-01.09.2019, specifically whether or not: H1) the intraday behaviour of hourly returns is different on overreaction days compared to normal days; H2) there is a momentum effect on overreaction days, and H3) after one-day abnormal returns. The methods used for the analysis include a number of statistical methods as well as a trading simulation approach. The results suggest that hourly returns during the day of positive\/negative overreactions are significantly higher\/lower than those during the average positive\/negative day. Overreactions can usually be detected before the day ends by estimating specific timing parameters. Prices tend to move in the direction of the overreaction till the end of the day when it occurs, which implies the existence of a momentum effect on that day giving rise to exploitable profit opportunities. This effect (together with profit opportunities) is also observed on the following day. In two cases (BTCUSD positive overreactions and ETHUSD negative overreactions) a contrarian effect is detected instead.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

#468 – Dynamic Momentum Strategy<\/a><\/strong> <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Period of rebalancing:<\/strong> Monthly
Markets traded: <\/strong>equities
Instruments used for trading:<\/strong> stocks
Complexity:<\/strong> Complex strategy
Backtest period:<\/strong> 2004 – 2018
Indicative performance:<\/strong> 6.11%
Estimated volatility:<\/strong> 10.00%<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Source paper:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Garg, Ashish and Goulding, Christian L. and Harvey, Campbell R. and Mazzoleni, Michele: Momentum Turning Points<\/strong>
https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3489539<\/a>
Abstracto:
Turning points are the Achilles’ heel of time-series momentum portfolios. Slow signals fail to react quickly to changes in trend while fast signals are often false alarms. We examine theoretically and empirically how momentum portfolios of various intermediate speeds, formed by blending slow and fast strategies, cope with turning points. Our model predicts an optimal dynamic speed selection strategy. We apply this strategy across domestic and international equity markets and document efficient out-of-sample performance. We also propose a novel decomposition of momentum strategy alpha, highlighting the role of volatility timing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

New research papers related to existing strategies:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

#26 – Value (Book-to-Market) Factor<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Arnott, Harvey, Kalesnik, Linnainmaa: Reports of Value\u2019s Death May Be Greatly Exaggerated<\/strong>
https:\/\/papers.ssrn.com\/sol3\/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3488748<\/a>
Abstracto:
Value investing has underperformed growth investing for over 12 years with a -39.1% drawdown from peak to trough using the classic Fama-French definition of the value factor. The second-longest duration of underperformance occurred during the tech bubble, and while deeper than the recent drawdown, lasted less than 4 years. As a result, many now argue, relying on a variety of narratives, that the value investing style is no longer viable. We examine some of these narratives and find them wanting. We use a bootstrap analysis to show that the likelihood (given the historical data) of observing such a large drawdown is about 1 in 20\u2014unusual but not enough to support structural impairment. We then decompose the value\u2013growth performance into three components: the migration of securities, a profit differential, and the change in a valuation spread. Our analysis of pre- and post-2007 data reveal no significant difference between the migration of stocks (from value to neutral or growth or from growth to neutral or value) in the two periods nor do we observe a difference in profitability. The drawdown is explained by the third component: value has become unusually cheap relative to growth with the valuation now in the 97th percentile of the historical distribution. We show that, even accounting for intangibles, which have eroded the relevance of book value, the drawdown is explained by value becoming exceptionally relatively cheap. Even given the noisy nature of returns, expected returns are always elevated when in the extreme lower tail of a distribution. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Tokat-Acikel, Aiolfi, Jin: Multi-Asset Value Payoff: Is Recent Underperformance Cyclical?<\/strong>
https:\/\/papers.ssrn.com\/sol3\/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3493335<\/a>
Abstracto:
Value is one of the most studied risk premia strategies across asset classes. Value factors, however, have struggled lately. To uncover the drivers of recent value factor underperformance, it is important to understand how value returns are affected by macroeconomic conditions. We build on the existing literature by directly measuring the macroeconomic characteristics of value factor portfolios, namely real economic growth and inflation exposures. By pairing methodologies commonly used to derive fundamental characteristics of equity portfolios, we are able to identify macro linkages that have not been previously made evident. Our holdings-based and factor-mimicking portfolio analyses provide insights into the behavior of value strategies across various asset classes, looking at both cyclical and idiosyncratic drivers. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

#199 – ROA Effect within Stocks<\/a><\/strong>
#224 – Profitability Factor Combined with Value Factor<\/a>
#229 – Earnings Quality Factor <\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hsu, Kalesnik, Kose: What Is Quality?<\/strong>
https:\/\/www.tandfonline.com\/doi\/full\/10.1080\/0015198X.2019.1567194<\/a>
Abstracto:
Unlike standard factors, such as value, momentum, and size, \u201cquality\u201d lacks a commonly accepted definition. Practitioners, however, are increasingly gravitating to this style factor. They define quality to be various signals or combinations of signals\u2014some that have been thoroughly explored in the academic literature and others that have received limited attention. Among a comprehensive group of the quality categories used by practitioners, we find that profitability, accounting quality, payout\/dilution, and investment tend to be associated with a return premium whereas capital structure, earnings stability, and growth in profitability show little evidence of a premium. Profitability and investment-related characteristics tend to capture most of the quality return premium.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

And two interesting free blog post has been published during last 2 weeks:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The CAPE Ratio and Machine Learning<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Professor Robert Shiller\u2019s work and his famous CAPE \n(cyclically-adjusted price-to-earnings) ratio is well known among the \ninvestment community. His methodology for assessing a valuation of the \nU.S. equity market is not the first one but is surely the most cited and\n the most discussed. There are numerous papers that tweak or adjust \nShiller\u2019s methodology to assess better if U.S. equities are under- or \nover-valued. We recommend the work of Wang, Ahluwalia, Aliaga-Diaz, and \nDavis (all from The Vanguard Group ) in which they use a combination of \nmachine learning and a regression-based approach to obtain forecasted \nCAPE ratio, and subsequently, U.S. stock market returns, more \naccurately. <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Autores:<\/strong> Wang, Ahluwalia, Aliaga-Diaz, Davis<\/p>\n\n\n\n

T\u00edtulo: <\/strong>The Best of Both Worlds: Forecasting US Equity Market Returns using a Hybrid Machine Learning \u2013 Time Series Approach<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Alternative Fair-Value Models for Currency Value Strategy<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The idea of buying an investment asset for a lower price than a fair-value is the cornerstone of value factor<\/a>\n strategies. Various value strategies were popularized by famous \ninvestor Benjamin Graham (and his successors like Warren Buffett) and \nwere firstly employed in the stock market. This idea of looking for \ninvestment opportunities that can be bought cheaply can also be applied \nin currency markets \u2013 Currency Value Factor strategy<\/a>.\n There is, however, one catch \u2013 an investor must know the fair-value \nexchange rate for currencies. The most popular equilibrium exchange rate\n model used for this purpose is based on PPP (purchasing power parity). A\n new research paper written by Ca\u2019 Zorzi, Cap, Mijakovic, and Rubaszek \nanalyzes two additional models \u2013 Behavioral Equilibrium Exchange Rate \n(BEER) and the Macroeconomic Balance (MB) approach to assess which model\n has the best forecasting power.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Autores:<\/strong> Ca\u2019 Zorzi, Cap, Mijakovic, Rubaszek<\/p>\n\n\n\n

T\u00edtulo: <\/strong>The Predictive Power of Equilibrium Exchange Rate Models<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

\u00bfBuscas m\u00e1s estrategias para leer? Suscr\u00edbete a nuestro bolet\u00edn informativo<\/a> o visite nuestra Blog<\/a> o Evaluador<\/a><\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u00bfQuieres saber m\u00e1s sobre el servicio Quantpedia Premium? Consulta C\u00f3mo funciona Quantpedia<\/a>, nuestra misi\u00f3n<\/a> y Oferta de precios premium<\/a>.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u00bfQuieres saber m\u00e1s sobre el servicio Quantpedia Pro? Compru\u00e9balo descripci\u00f3n<\/a>, mirar videos<\/a>, revisar capacidades de generaci\u00f3n de informes<\/a> y visite nuestro oferta de precios<\/a>.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u00bfBuscas datos hist\u00f3ricos o plataformas de backtesting? Consulta nuestra lista de Descuentos en Algo Trading<\/a><\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u00bfTe gustar\u00eda tener acceso gratuito a? nuestros servicios<\/a>? Entonces, Abre una cuenta con Lightspeed.<\/a> y disfrute de un a\u00f1o de Quantpedia Premium sin costo alguno.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

O s\u00edguenos en:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Facebook Grupo<\/a>, Facebook P\u00e1gina<\/a>, Gorjeo<\/a>, LinkedIn<\/a>, Medio<\/a> o YouTube<\/a><\/strong><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Two new strategies have been added.<\/p>\n

Two new related research papers have been included into existing strategy reviews. And two short free blog posts<\/strong><\/a> have been published during last few weeks.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5681","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/vvv.quantpedia.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5681","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/vvv.quantpedia.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/vvv.quantpedia.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vvv.quantpedia.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vvv.quantpedia.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5681"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/vvv.quantpedia.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5681\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/vvv.quantpedia.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5681"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vvv.quantpedia.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5681"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vvv.quantpedia.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5681"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}